Supernotes 3.2 is such a delight, filled with so many thoughtful & subtle touches. This morning on desktop, for instance, I was trying to figure out how in the world to change the sorting of a collection. The function isn’t where it used to be. Then I spotted it: right underneath the collection title. Brilliant! It couldn’t possibly be more convenient.
Multi-select is now much easier and useful with the new table layout. Little thing after little thing. So many improvements.
I use Supernotes primarily as a personal journal. I’m 72, retired and no longer a student, so the academic and scientific uses I hear about are not applicable to me. I grew bored after years with Day One and needed something more atheistically beautiful to inspire me. And Supernotes is definitely beautiful. Being my journal, my content in Supernotes is very important to me.
As Supernotes improves and I learn it better, I’m thinking about additional ways I might use it. Which brings me to the point of this little essay.
I worry about Supernotes’ longevity. I can see a time where you guys — Tobias and Connor — might decide you want to move on and do other things with your lives. You kind of acknowledged this yourselves in your blog post about lifetime subscriptions where the “lifetime” in question is the software, not the subscriber.
I recall the early days of Evernote. It was quirky, cool and exciting. The developers did wonderful podcasts. It’s since been sold to Bending Spoons, is bloated and unreasonably expensive. Just recently the Browser Company launched Arc, a very creative new approach to the web browser experience. Well, that only lasted about a year and they’ve moved on.
Hopefully you guys will hang in with Supernotes a long time. Being 72 I guess I don’t have to worry as much as someone 25. 
But should Supernotes ever sell, I hope iron-clad provisions will lock the new owner(s) into keeping existing data intact and accessible.