Hi
The list view is great. What I am missing is to set an even smaller list view, as an overview whats in a folder or under custom collection. Just a list of clickable titles under a parent or so.
To be honest, after that amazing time, I spend very little time with supernotes now.
Just because the existing view mode is too easy to interrupt my train of thought.
I’m curious, besides the different view modes, what has led you to spend less time on Supernotes lately?
I’ve noticed that you’ve highlighted several feature requests, many of which are quite substantial and complex to implement. As a new guideline, if there’s nothing additional to contribute to a topic, we’re beginning to ask members to avoid simply commenting to express their interest, and to use likes instead. We gauge popularity more objectively using view counts and likes, and encouraging comments to be new thoughts and ideas promotes better discussion without being interspersed with +1s. If something truly urgent arises, such as a bug that’s stopping you from working, please send us a direct message in the app.
Features vary in importance among members with differing use cases, and we’re trying our best to ensure Supernotes moves in a direction that helps you while staying fast and streamlined. We’ve added a huge number of new features in the past year, and now we’re taking the time to consolidate and review our features as well as fix all the outstanding bugs before starting to work on another big release. We promise more will come soon and are looking forward to sharing these updates with you in due course!
Thanks for your reply.
You are right. I expressed impatience in my expression. Sorry for that.
My reduced usage time is mainly due to the fact that the existing view mode cannot meet my need for quick browsing of multi-level parent-child cards.
The current multi-level deep list view mode does not have any structural relationships, and if I don’t use a multi-layer penetrable view mode, I will get lost in the process of clicking down repeatedly.
In addition, the whiteboard mode is more conducive for users to forget about structural relationships, freely arrange them, and link their thoughts. Apart from these details, they do not decisively affect my usage. (above is translation)
Another thing
I think SN foucs more Feasibility of mobile ,but the desktop app is the key point.
I see many issues being put on hold for the adaptation of mobile devices, which hinders the progress of some new features for desktop. What I want to say is that mobile devices are already very useful as an inbox and search box.
Hope SN team can bring more desktop features for us.
I would agree that multi level browsing is a challenge. While you can adjust visibility levels, it makes it tough to grasp the relationships easily. An improvement here would be welcome, though I understand it may take a while due to complexity.
No need to apologise! Thanks for the additional detail, we’ve noted your thoughts concerning multi-level browsing and will see what we can do for you. I’d also like to learn why the Outline isn’t helping you in this instance? Is it because it doesn’t show you all your cards / you don’t have enough cards set to Priority?
A quick note on our mobile app vs desktop app. Having a dumbed down mobile app purely for capturing has never been a direction we’ve wanted to pursue – that’s exactly the problem with other apps – if you want to expand on your ideas, edit them that’s not possible. And we certainly don’t hold off features because they won’t work on mobile. Broadsheet View for example is only available on larger screen devices and we recently improved it to handle customizable columns.
We also love that Supernotes works as a narrow window on Desktop so you can take notes beside a Zoom call / Browser for example. The comparison is better phrased as a Narrow vs a Wide app; and this flexibility is one of greatest strengths.
I second the points of @fuzzy.beach and @EternalSummer about relation. I now see this strictly from the perspective of how we all perceive information, think about it and also network it. its not a criticism but an observation. Not every person sees/finds/needs the same overview over cards and connection (children and/or topics). Some users like it structured in hierarchical manner (which is given), other need the relations graphically (given today), while others like having an fast topic overview with relations and they go deep afterwards. Perhaps there were more wishes? So this is how fast do different thinkers find their overview about the content. I really like Supernotes, but sometimes I just want to have a quick overview about what about parents, its children and its relations. Flat, simply listed, just pieces of information, which bring the information fragments together, which is mentioned in this thread. I think it well worth having a friendly process about thinking, structuring and discussing about how different Supernotes users will access/find the way to their information bundles or elements. It is not (only) a question of how fancy/functional must a new information access view be on what device IMHO. I do really have no prob if not every kind of information access view is available on my phone, but on a tablet or desktop there I want more . I know this answer is more general and also about thinking and access to information, but elegant notetaking seems to be a helping glue within.
OMG , It’s what my mind think.
My thought just is what you say!!!
these view modes not only add for add, but also add for think relation of parent-son cards in one second, not interruption with click and click and click the mouse.